🔒breach.co.nz · the NZ & Australia breach register 🛡️ A Govern service
Register › 🇳🇿 NZ › Legal
Legal sector · leaderboard
Own the Legal leaderboard
The top banner across the Legal overview and every Legal record — one advertiser, exclusively.
Own this leaderboard → breach@govern.co.nz

Langley Twigg — Napier law firm

🇳🇿 Napier, Hawke's Bay · Langley Twigg Law · Record NZ-2026-0001
○ Reported — awaiting official confirmation
Reported — awaiting official confirmation. The facts below are drawn from the organisation's own disclosure and credible reporting. Figures are as reported; unknowns are labelled, not estimated by us.
People affected
Not disclosed
Breach date
2026-01-11
Regulator
NZ Privacy Commissioner (notified)
Trust tier
B · Reported
TimelineDisclosed within the same month after the breach (dates as precise as the sources allow)
Breach
11 Jan 2026
Disclosed
Jan 2026
Disclosed — no regulator outcome yet
as of 7 Nov 2026
Share this record in · Share on LinkedIn ⬇ Download share card

Data exposed

Some client documents Company-confirmed
Passport scans (employee & client), as reported from material the group published Media-reported
Internal firm information Company-confirmed

Confidence: Confirmed = regulator/court · Company-confirmed = the organisation's own disclosure · Media-reported = press. Figures without an official source are labelled, not estimated.

What happened

Langley Twigg Law, a Napier law firm, said its security monitoring software detected unauthorised activity on its network on 11 January 2026, and that it disconnected the network and engaged its IT provider and forensic specialists [lt-lw], [rnz]. In a notice on its website on 26 January the firm described a “malicious third-party attack” and said a small proportion of its data had been compromised, including internal firm information and some client documents [lt-lw], [rnz].

The Anubis ransomware group claimed responsibility on its leak site on 25 January 2026 and later released what it said was 380 GB of data; that volume is the group’s claim and has not been confirmed by the firm [lt-cyberdaily-update]. Media reported that material the group published included passport scans of employees and clients [cyberdaily], [lt-ib].

Data exposed

The firm said internal firm information and some client documents were involved [rnz]. Passport scans were reported by media from material the group published [cyberdaily]. The number of people affected has not been disclosed and is not estimated here.

Timeline

  • 2026-01-11 — The firm’s monitoring detected unauthorised network activity, per the firm [lt-lw].
  • 2026-01-25 — Anubis listed the firm on its leak site [lt-lw], [lt-cyberdaily-update].
  • 2026-01-26 — The firm published a notice about the incident [lt-lw].
  • 2026-01-29 — The Office of the Privacy Commissioner confirmed the firm had been in touch; Police said they were investigating [rnz-opc].
  • 2026-02 — The firm obtained a High Court injunction over the data and gave an update on the incident [lt-cyberdaily-update].

Current status

Disclosed. The Privacy Commissioner has been notified; no regulator finding has been reported [rnz-opc]. Figures for data volume are the attacker’s claim [lt-cyberdaily-update]. The firm’s original website notice is no longer online; this record relies on reporting that quotes it.

Why it matters

Small and mid-sized professional-services firms hold highly sensitive client data — identity documents, legal case files — and are a frequent target for data-theft extortion.

GGOVERN Tabletop Exercises · Govern house Strengthen your cyber resilience — rehearse the decisions that matter. Book a Discovery Call →